|
Post by Donau1910 on Mar 15, 2006 23:26:08 GMT -5
Driller:
Glad to see you back, hope your absence was due to fun and or productive endeavors! Any thoughts on why the ECPN phase II assay report has not been released yet? What might it contain to need to be verified by multiple consultants/geologists? Do you think WITM may go the same way as ECPN since they brought Mr. Mottley on board? I could use another ECPN in my portfolio! Thanks for any insight.
Cheers
|
|
|
Post by Donau1910 on Mar 28, 2006 0:07:29 GMT -5
Is there anybody out there? (sorry had The Wall going in the background tonight.) Is anyone following the runup of ECPN? Will WITM follow the same path in the not too distant future? Anyone know anything about the WITM claims?
Cheers!
|
|
|
Post by raidermike99 on Mar 28, 2006 12:36:03 GMT -5
Is there anybody out there? (sorry had The Wall going in the background tonight.) Is anyone following the runup of ECPN? Will WITM follow the same path in the not too distant future? Anyone know anything about the WITM claims? Cheers! Yes I wished I would have bought when it was under a buck. Not sure about WITM.
|
|
|
Post by Donau1910 on Mar 28, 2006 22:10:11 GMT -5
I'm not sure about WITM either. I do like what Mr. Mottley has done at ECPN for the shareholders! (Unlike another chief executive not far from our hearts on this board.) The fact that WITM has brought him on board intriuges me. Unfortunately I am far removed from Colorado and South Africa where WITM have some activity. I was hoping a person with some knowledge of the industry and perhaps a connection or 2 in Colorado may have some insight into WITM
|
|
|
Post by Donau1910 on Mar 28, 2006 22:13:28 GMT -5
On a side note...is there any connection between ECPN and CMKM other than the COD partnership with UCAD? The Oliver Stone fan in me wants to believe these delays by ECPN are somehow not really caused by a furnace purchase required by one of the consultants.
|
|
|
Post by raidermike99 on Mar 30, 2006 7:28:07 GMT -5
On a side note...is there any connection between ECPN and CMKM other than the COD partnership with UCAD? The Oliver Stone fan in me wants to believe these delays by ECPN are somehow not really caused by a furnace purchase required by one of the consultants. I had always hoped there was more but I sat in on one of the Motley ECPN conference calls and he denied the relationship with CMKX but there were some holes in his denial so it still left me wondering.
|
|
|
Post by Donau1910 on Mar 30, 2006 21:11:56 GMT -5
Raider...What was your impression of Mr. Mottley during the call you sat in on. Did he present facts or "possibilities"? Did he seem grounded in the business or did he appear to promise "dsa moon"? The PRs coming out of ECPN are quite promising but they have not released the verification. It has been delayed several months. Either it is very good...OR...they are trying to get all they can before the stuff hits the fan. Sound familiar? I should not complain because at least the share price has moved in the right direction over the last 18 months. Evidently Mr. Mottley is doing something right. Will he bring the same effect to WITM? I have not purchased any WITM yet but it is definately on my radar. Thanks for your input!
|
|
|
Post by irishpack on Mar 31, 2006 13:41:18 GMT -5
Raider...What was your impression of Mr. Mottley during the call you sat in on. Did he present facts or "possibilities"? Did he seem grounded in the business or did he appear to promise "dsa moon"? The PRs coming out of ECPN are quite promising but they have not released the verification. It has been delayed several months. Either it is very good...OR...they are trying to get all they can before the stuff hits the fan. Sound familiar? I should not complain because at least the share price has moved in the right direction over the last 18 months. Evidently Mr. Mottley is doing something right. Will he bring the same effect to WITM? I have not purchased any WITM yet but it is definately on my radar. Thanks for your input! I sat in the same conference call. He did deny any connection with CMKM but talked about their plan and how he was going to execute it. I can't remember all the details, it was awhile ago but he did seem legit.
|
|
|
Post by raidermike99 on Apr 1, 2006 13:07:47 GMT -5
Raider...What was your impression of Mr. Mottley during the call you sat in on. Did he present facts or "possibilities"? Did he seem grounded in the business or did he appear to promise "dsa moon"? The PRs coming out of ECPN are quite promising but they have not released the verification. It has been delayed several months. Either it is very good...OR...they are trying to get all they can before the stuff hits the fan. Sound familiar? I should not complain because at least the share price has moved in the right direction over the last 18 months. Evidently Mr. Mottley is doing something right. Will he bring the same effect to WITM? I have not purchased any WITM yet but it is definately on my radar. Thanks for your input! I sat in the same conference call. He did deny any connection with CMKM but talked about their plan and how he was going to execute it. I can't remember all the details, it was awhile ago but he did seem legit. That is correct. He seemed to more of an idea on execution rather that wishfull thinking.
|
|